Joaquín Prat shocked viewers by claiming that Makoke’s unexpected elimination from Supervivientes 2025 was not due to her performance, but because she was used as a “bargaining chip.” His controversial comments have sparked debate about possible unfair strategies and even gender bias behind the scenes. Many fans and commentators agree that Makoke was unjustly ousted, especially since she had no major conflicts within the camp. Prat’s speculation that her exit was influenced by internal alliances has led to heated discussions both online and on television. The phrase “Makoke was used as a pawn” has now gone viral, and questions are being raised about the integrity of the show’s voting system. Is there more than meets the eye when it comes to eliminations on Supervivientes 2025? Read on to find out why this scandal is causing such a stir across Spain and beyond.
Image: Getty Images
Makoke’s Emotional Exit: Was Her Elimination Truly Fair?
The fifth gala of Supervivientes 2025 turned into an emotional whirlwind, particularly for Makoke, who became the center of attention for reasons both heartwarming and heartbreaking. What began as a moment of joy—receiving encouraging medical updates—quickly spiraled into disbelief when she was eliminated in a surprise twist, losing out to Carmen Alcayde.
Image: Getty Images
The elimination sent shockwaves through fans and commentators alike, as Makoke had not shown any aggressive behavior or conflict toward her fellow contestants. Her team, with the exception of Anita, seemingly turned their backs on her without any clear provocation. This left many viewers confused and frustrated.
Carmen Borrego, a panelist on Vamos a ver, openly questioned the decision, saying, “Makoke didn’t do anything to deserve such treatment. She’s been respectful to everyone.” Joaquín Prat echoed the sentiment: “We haven’t seen any clips of her speaking ill of others behind their backs.”
Still, controversy brewed behind the scenes. Laura Cuevas accused Makoke of spreading damaging claims about Álvaro Muñoz Escassi. While these allegations lacked visual proof, the damage was done, and the seeds of doubt had been planted.
Joaquín Prat Drops the Bomb: “Makoke Was Just a Bargaining Chip”
During a heated discussion on Vamos a ver, Joaquín Prat made a comment that quickly went viral: “Makoke was just a piece of exchange.” This statement set the tone for a debate that extended well beyond the TV studio. According to Prat, Makoke’s departure had less to do with audience preference and more to do with manipulative tactics behind closed doors.
Image: Getty Images
Prat suggested that certain contestants may have formed strategic alliances, sacrificing Makoke in a move to protect themselves from nominations. He elaborated, “Makoke took a dangerous route by handling sensitive information carelessly. If you’re not going to share it on camera, then why discuss it at all—especially with someone like Laura Cuevas in the room?”
Other commentators like Pepe del Real also chimed in, criticizing her for speculating about confidential matters with Álvaro nearby. “Doing that shows a lack of respect and a breach of team spirit,” he noted.
While some may argue that Makoke’s game strategy backfired, others believe she never stood a chance against an orchestrated campaign to remove her. Either way, her elimination is now being seen as one of the most controversial of the season.
Are Female Contestants Being Targeted in Supervivientes 2025?
Beyond the personal drama surrounding Makoke’s elimination lies a broader concern: Is there a pattern of gender bias emerging in Supervivientes 2025?
Joaquín Prat posed a question many fans had already begun asking online: “Is it just coincidence, or is there something more to the fact that all the eliminated contestants so far have been women?”
Image: Getty Images
His question holds weight. The first contestants voted off the island were all female—Samya, Nieves Bolós, Ángela Ponce, and now Makoke. Carmen Borrego added fuel to the fire by suggesting a possible pact among the male contestants: “They’ve made a silent agreement to only nominate women so they can avoid elimination themselves.”
This revelation has sparked outrage among viewers who now feel that the eliminations may not be entirely audience-driven. Instead, what appears to be democratic voting may actually be the result of internal team politics and gender-based strategies.
If the claims are true, they raise serious concerns about the integrity of the competition. Supervivientes markets itself as a fair and thrilling survival reality show, but these allegations could change public perception—and possibly force changes in how nominations are conducted moving forward.
Is Reality TV Still Real? The Bigger Implications Behind Makoke’s Exit
Makoke’s sudden departure from Supervivientes 2025 has triggered more than just viewer frustration—it’s ignited a full-blown conversation about fairness, manipulation, and possible gender bias in reality television.
Image: Getty Images
Joaquín Prat’s statement that “Makoke was a bargaining chip” has become a symbol for everything wrong with how eliminations might be orchestrated behind the scenes. While some believe Makoke made critical missteps by involving herself in gossip and speculative narratives, others see her as a victim of alliances and a flawed nomination process.
As more viewers demand transparency, the producers may be forced to reevaluate the game’s structure. Is the audience truly in control, or are we watching a scripted play unfold under the guise of competition?
One thing is clear: Makoke’s elimination has become one of the most talked-about moments of the season, not just for the emotions it stirred, but for the deeper issues it brought into the spotlight.
Do you believe Makoke’s exit was fair, or was she simply a casualty of a much larger game? Share your opinion, join the conversation, and keep following the drama of Supervivientes 2025—because this season is far from over!
